22 May 2019
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has a growing impact on jobs and workers. Today, the OECD is releasing its first Recommendation on AI as part of its annual Ministerial Council Meeting, recognising that a “fair transition” is needed for workers affected by AI deployment with social dialogue as means towards achieving it. The OECD AI Principles recognise trade unions as a relevant stakeholder and call for a responsible use of AI at work under the premise of inclusive growth and sustainable development.
The OECD Recommendation is the first set of international standards on AI developed in a multi-stakeholder setting – involving the TUAC in cooperation with UNI Global Union. They are signed by all OECD members – as well as Argentina, Brazil, Colombia and Costa Rica.
The TUAC welcomes that the Principles include obligations to all AI actors and stakeholders “for the responsible stewardship of trustworthy AI”, and provides a roadmap for public policy action.
The principles are a step towards seriously addressing a reality of a few actors capturing most of the AI market. Policy makers and stakeholders, including unions, need strong frameworks to navigate this complex and changing space. Importantly, now the OECD itself and its members have to showcase their commitment through concrete actions on valuable outcomes such as:
It is important that now with the Recommendation adopted to continue developing a better understanding of the effects of AI on our economies through an inclusive growth lens with the help of the AI Observatory – on which trade unions should be represented.
Going from there policies need to be concretely developed fostering built-in security and ethics, accountability and transparency in AI systems that lead to fair, non-discriminatory outcomes for users, including the workforce. For now, algorithmically-powered systems are often opaque, create bias and security risks for workers.
AI is a major trade union concern from different angles that need more attention:
To make AI improve working conditions, it is a key requirement to let workers and their representatives participate and negotiate the goals of the use of technology from the very beginning. The bottom line is that workers need to be informed and understand any workplace and organisational decisions made on the basis of AI affecting their tasks, income, health and safety. Trade unions, works councils, safety and health organisations and training bodies need to be involved in future policy discussions and decisions – also by strengthening bargaining and co-determination rights. Social partners and governments need to make sure that productivity gains of AI are adequately measured and shared – and not ring-fenced in a for now concentrated market.